Skip to Content

San Francisco Chronicle staffers asked to sign buyout agreement that likely includes an illegal clause

About five percent of the Chronicle's staff were approved to take a buyout, first offered at the beginning of the month

4:56 PM PDT on October 31, 2024

Eleven employees at the San Francisco Chronicle have requested and have been approved for a buyout, first offered at the beginning of the month, according to a contract viewed by Gazetteer SF. But the paper may have violated federal labor law by including a non-disparagement clause in its severance contracts, according to an expert.

Staffers who requested buyouts have been asked to sign an agreement from Hearst, the Chronicle's parent company, which includes a clause promising “not to do or say anything, verbally or in writing, directly or indirectly, that reflects negatively on or otherwise detrimentally affects any Releasee’s products or services.” If workers do not sign, they will not be eligible for severance, but will still likely lose their jobs, according to the contract, which has been reviewed by Gazetteer SF.

Non-disparagement clauses like this one cannot be included in any severance contract, thanks to a National Labor Relations Board ruling in 2023, said Jason Lohr, a litigation attorney at Lohr Ripamonti & Segarich. 

“I just don’t think that clause could be enforceable,” Lohr, who is unaffiliated with the Chronicle or its union, told Gazetteer after reviewing the section of the buyout offer. “What the NLRB wants to do is to allow workers to communicate with each other about anything in the job site, and by saying you can’t talk about this stuff at work, you’re infringing upon the rights that they’re entitled.”

Workers were not allowed to read the agreement before requesting a buyout. In a memo notifying the paper's 200-some staffers about the buyouts, Chronicle publisher Bill Nagel wrote that employees who decline to sign the agreement will still be “terminated by reason of submitting the program application form as your resignation.” Additionally, Nagel wrote that “the terms offered now will not be offered in the future.”

Lohr emphasized that workers who do sign the agreement will not be bound by the non-disparagement clause under NLRB rules, should they wish to talk about their former employer after taking the buyout. (Anyone who does is welcome to contact this reporter at joshua@gazetteer.co.) 

“These employees can say whatever they want about the Chronicle and the Chronicle cannot enforce that,” he said. 

Nagel did not respond to a request for comment from Gazetteer

Editor’s note: The author was a member of the Chronicle’s union from January 2021 to October 2021. He was a news reporter at SFGATE, which is editorially independent from the Chronicle

Thanks for reading! If you liked this article, share it with someone. That’s the best way for new readers to discover Gazetteer SF.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More Stories

Jollibee Watch: All (well, most) has been revealed

A Jollibee exec answers some of our pressing questions

July 31, 2026

Drinking Companion: Fool’s Errand is the wise choice

If you can take some noise and don’t mind the first dates, this buzzy NoPa wine bar is perfect for after-work plots 

July 31, 2026

Yalies raised $17 million this summer in Nob Hill hacker house

For a group of fresh-faced entrepreneurs, securing VC funding was probably easier than finding white clam pizza

July 30, 2026

Ordinary People

San Francisco has been destroyed in a lot of movies (thanks, Hollywood), but 2014’s ‘Godzilla’ reboot made the place feel real

July 30, 2026

For the Hacker Herren, every day is Oktoberfest

Hoisting a pint with members of the nationwide beer-guzzling men’s club as they train for Munich

July 30, 2026