Skip to Content

Uber wants an $18 million tax refund from the city of SF

Everyone could use some extra cash right now — even one of SF’s largest tech firms

Last week, Uber sued the city of San Francisco, demanding a hefty refund for taxes the company paid two years ago “under protest.” 

According to the suit, filed Friday in San Francisco Superior Court and first reported by the San Francisco Business Times Monday afternoon, Uber wants a $18,750,433.49 refund on taxes it paid to the city in 2022. Uber claims that it should only be taxed on the service fees it receives, not the fares that it collects from users and distributes to drivers. 

The gist of Uber’s argument goes something like this: Uber drivers and delivery workers are independent contractors, not Uber employees — a distinction upheld late last month by the California Supreme Court. Therefore, Uber itself “does not provide transportation or delivery service” and shouldn’t be treated as a transportation or delivery company. Its service, instead, helps drivers and couriers “get leads to potential Riders and Eaters,” according to the suit. 

While it does collect fares for its drivers, Uber alleges that the entire sum is transferred into a separate account — independent of Uber’s coffers — that gets disbursed to drivers.

(One curious tidbit from the suit: In addition to identifying its drivers as contractors, Uber identifies all of its non-software engineers — including sales and marketing, legal, finance, IT, HR, and executive assistants — as “overhead” in the suit, since a vast majority of its operational expenses are for its engineering and design teams.)

As a result, the fares users pay for rides and food deliveries “are not income to Plaintiff for federal income tax purposes,” according to Uber’s legal team. (Uber doesn’t even report them as gross receipts for federal or state tax returns, it says.) The federal IRS and SEC, as well as the California Franchise Tax Board agree with the company, Uber claims, since both have allowed Uber to report service fees alone as gross income. 

But San Francisco had Uber pay taxes on the full amount of both fares and service fees, according to the suit. Now, the company wants those taxes back.

City Attorney’s Office deputy press secretary Alex Barrett-Shorter told Gazetteer SF in a statement that their office has yet to be served with the lawsuit.

“Once we are served with the lawsuit, we will review the complaint and respond appropriately,” Barrett-Shorter told Gazetteer SF.

Uber spokesperson Zahid Arab declined to comment to Gazetteer SF. 

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Gazetteer SF

Up all night in the Tenderloin

We spent a full night in San Francisco’s alleged heart of crime and misery, and lived to tell this epic saga of the streets

April 25, 2025

Waymo drove off with SF tennis instructor’s equipment in trunk, suit alleges

He alleges that he’s been in a months-long struggle to get any answers from Waymo

April 23, 2025

Pokémon trading cards have never been bigger. For its biggest fans, SF’s Gamescape is the place to be.

On Thursdays, the Lower Haight games shops hosts an ‘open play’ night that's become a haven for serious Pokémon fans

April 22, 2025

Ahead of Nintendo’s downtown arrival, a look back at the beloved PlayStation store

Perhaps the 90's-era Sony Metreon was ahead of its time, but now Nintendo has a chance to recapture some of the magic it left behind

April 18, 2025

Mr. Tan goes to Washington… and the battle over ‘Little Tech’ is heating up

Silicon Valley leaders, regulators, and elected officials came together earlier this month to debate the future of small startups, but the issue is more divisive than it seems

April 17, 2025