Skip to Content

San Francisco’s Innocence Commission seems to have been on hiatus for nearly a year

The commission, tasked with looking for wrongful convictions on behalf of the District Attorney, hasn’t met since April 2024

The Innocence Commission, a five-member team of volunteer experts, is supposed to work with the office of San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins to review potential wrongful convictions. 

The commission formed in 2020, as a priority of then-District Attorney Chesa Boudin. It secured a major win with the 2022 exoneration of Joaquin Ciria, who had spent 32 years in prison for a shooting homicide.

But more than two years later, the commission appears to have frozen to a halt. What were nearly monthly meetings trickled to a complete stop in April 2024. None of the commission’s members responded to repeated requests from Gazetteer SF about what the group is working on, if anything.

A Gazetteer review of the commission’s emailed agendas and meeting reminders between September 2022 and December 2024 shows it held near-monthly meetings from September through July 2023 — and then no sessions until February 2024. It scheduled meetings for March and April, but the records stop there. 

According to the District Attorney’s office, the Innocence Commission must include an academic, a medical expert, a retired judge, and representatives from the Public Defender’s Office and District Attorney’s office. All members are appointed by the D.A., and they are empowered to investigate wrongful conviction claims and make recommendations to the D.A.’s Post-Conviction Review Unit, which has the final authority to take up a case and prepare court proceedings. 

Boudin was recalled in a contentious 2022 vote, and then-Mayor London Breed appointed Jenkins to the D.A. role. While Jenkins went on a firing spree with Boudin’s staff, she kept the Innocence Commission as part of her office. As part of reforms to the commission, Jenkins fired Assistant District Attorney and commission liaison Arcelia Hurtado, then appointed Julia Cervantes, new lead attorney for the DA’s Post-Conviction Review office, in her place. 

“Unfortunately, there are far too many cases of innocent people being behind bars when they shouldn’t be,” Jenkins stated in an announcement of the change. “My office is committed to ensuring the integrity and longevity of the Commission for years to come.”

Hurtado told the Bay Area Reporter in 2022 that she was fired without cause. She declined a request from Gazetteer to discuss her work, instead directing questions to Innocence Commission Chair Lara Bazelon, a professor and director of the Criminal Juvenile Justice and Racial Justice clinical programs at the University of San Francisco. Bazelon did not respond to multiple emails and phone calls. 

Another member of the commission, retired Judge LaDoris Cordell, initially offered to speak to Gazetteer on the record, but stopped replying on Dec. 2.

Commission member Jacque Wilson, who is deputy public defender at the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office, also did not provide comment. In an email, his office wrote that “he doesn’t have any updates to share.” Attempts to contact Dr. Michael Meade, the commission’s medical expert, went unanswered.

Records of the commission’s past agendas, which were reviewed by Gazetteer, show the group was in the middle of discussing a criminal case when the meetings stopped, including mentions of DNA testing results and a collaboration with Santa Clara County’s Crime Laboratory

The most recent email, regarding an April meeting of the commission, also notes there was an “initial draft of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Memorandum” about the case, the details of which were censored. According to the main website for the Innocence Commission, that document is the last step before the D.A.’s office decides whether to take up a case. 

The District Attorney’s office did not respond to repeated questions about whether the commission is still active, or has adjudicated any cases since the 2022 exoneration of Ciria. It is unclear whether the findings mentioned in the final emailed agenda in April 2024 were ever given to Jenkins’ office for review.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Gazetteer SF

Department of Public Health talks of ‘rebalancing’ and ‘consolidation’ as union and community worry about layoffs and clinic closures

SEIU 1021 was out in force as Daniel Tsai made the city’s case for cutting jobs while preserving the social safety net

April 22, 2026

Reading Palantir: Why the defense tech giant’s manifesto may signal panic inside the company

The war tech firm is suffering from a lethal combo of stock price superinflation and midterms anxiety

April 22, 2026

Cookbook Week 2026: Where visiting chefs will be dining in SF

Laotian watermelon salad, dreamy crab, and (they hope!) Mister Jiu’s. What chefs from around the country cannot wait to eat in the city this week

April 21, 2026

TBPN, MIA; MTS, G2G

Plus, is Palantir’s manifesto a cry for help?

April 20, 2026

Dean Preston’s PUML is punching up

The former District 5 Supervisor is collecting progressive media talent like Infinity Stones to push the city’s narrative leftward

April 20, 2026

Lolo Zouaï’s throwback car mix

The SF-raised singer’s playlist to drive around to (circa 2012) includes Kreayshawn, the xx, and ‘Love’

April 17, 2026
See all posts