Skip to Content

More than a man with a van: Guy behind the viral ‘Saikat lives in Maryland’ van has money ties to a pro-Wiener PAC

Conor Johnston has been paid nearly $30,000 by the PAC — but allegedly not for the van

The “Saikat lives in Maryland” van, owned by Conor Johnston, has been transformed into an anti-Connie Chan van. Photo: Chan_Life_SF via Instagram

All through primary season, a mysterious van adorned with the message “Saikat lives in Maryland” trailed congressional events, drawing attention to Saikat Chakrabarti’s slip-up in listing his primary address. 

As of Tuesday, the van is back in action with a slightly different message: “I live in this van b/c Connie Chan hates housing.” 

Gazetteer SF learned that the registered owner of the van is being paid by a super PAC that supports Scott Wiener. 

In April, the San Francisco Chronicle used California Department of Motor Vehicles data to identify Conor Johnston as the owner of the van. Johnston is a longtime Wiener supporter who served as chief of staff to London Breed when she was supervisor, and later advised her mayoral reelection campaign in 2024. He is also owner of the cannabis company Otter Brands, and has a history of political pranks and provocations. 

Johnston and his business have been paid nearly $30,000 by the Families for an Affordable San Francisco super PAC this year, according to financial disclosures to the Federal Election Commission. Families is a super PAC founded by Wiener’s active political director, Todd David, who remains the PAC’s treasurer.

On April 28, the PAC paid Otter Brands, Johnston’s cannabis company, $28,611.37 for “office consulting.” One week later, the PAC paid $1,000 to Johnston directly for “office refurbishment.” 

Recipients of PAC money who use the funds on communications that urge people to “vote for, elect, or defeat” a candidate have to disclose the source of the funding under state law. Sean McMorris, a transparency, ethics, and accountability program manager at California Common Cause, told the Chronicle in April the van may have dodged any “magic words” that explicitly advocate for voter action, thereby skirting the disclosure requirement. 

In a statement to Gazetteer, Sam Singer, spokesperson for the Families PAC, said that the PAC has “nothing to do with the ‘Connie Chan Hates Housing’ van,” but that the PAC staff “do find it entertaining, very smart and clever.” 

“Families for an Affordable SF PAC hired and paid Conor Johnston for land use consulting and tenant improvement management to help us locate, secure, and ready our campaign headquarters at 2055 Market St. for use. The site previously served as the campaign headquarters for Supervisor Aaron Peskin’s mayoral race in 2024,” Singer said in a text message.

“Since that time the front windows had been boarded up and the space was in disrepair. Mr. Johnston performed similar work for our Richmond District office, and a separate payment for that project will appear on upcoming campaign disclosure reports.” 

Singer insisted that the PAC is “fully complying with campaign finance law and properly reporting all expenditures and contributions.” 

The Wiener campaign declined to comment through spokesperson Joe Arellano. 

The Families PAC itself is a dark-money mess, as it leverages a 2024 FEC rule change in order for the PAC and Wiener’s official campaign to share staff and coordinate canvassing operations together. In May, campaign finance experts told Gazetteer that the rule change represents a massive breach of a foundational policy to ban communication between a super PAC and a federal campaign on materials that advocate for voter action. 

 “It’s contrary to a strong electoral system that ensures candidates are accountable to their constituents rather than big money and special interests,” Shanna Ports, senior counsel for the Campaign Legal Center’s campaign finance team, told Gazetteer.

Johnston’s messaging on the van focuses on the political talking point that Chan is an obstructionist on new housing construction, an accusation her critics have brought up during her time as District 1 supervisor. Chan, meanwhile, has described her approach as prioritizing the housing stability of existing residents and stumping for affordable housing. 

Most recently, Chan criticized the reduction of the city’s affordable housing requirement from 15 percent of total units to 5 percent in new market-rate buildings; Chan only voted in favor of the policy change after District 9 Supervisor Jackie Fielder’s amendment to require 8 percent in the Mission. 

Wiener himself has attacked Chan’s record on housing during his campaign for Congress, including with a June 23 Instagram post outlining the “extensive record” of Chan criticizing and pausing development in San Francisco. Wiener has touted his YIMBY approach to housing construction through the expediting of permits and upzoning to allow for more dense housing on existing sites, and has stated his support for subsidized affordable units and rent-control measures.

Johnston did not respond to Gazetteer’s multiple requests for comment via Instagram. In response to this reporter’s question in the comment section of a post about the re-done van, the account’s owner replied in glib fashion: “Sir, I'm a van. And a home.”

Thanks for reading! If you liked this article, share it with someone. That’s the best way for new readers to discover Gazetteer SF.

More Stories

Mandi House broke the curse

Yemeni hospitality, late night hours, and generous portions erase the memory of chronic closures at a Valencia Street storefront

October 28, 2026

Lurie heckled at D6 open house

‘We have to do better by you all,’ the mayor told vocal residents frustrated by crime, homelessness, and open drug use in their district

October 27, 2026

Anthropic has filed for IPO. And so it begins

Plus, is demand for compute high enough to justify all these data centers?

October 26, 2026

More AI researchers defect from Google DeepMind, fueling rumors of a sclerotic strategy inside the company

The three young engineers behind new data startup Data-Limited Regime are claiming they turned down the tech giant’s $300M retention offer

October 26, 2026